Izvestiya vuzov. Yadernaya Energetika

The peer-reviewed scientific and technology journal. ISSN: 0204-3327

A study into the scaling factor effects on the strength properties of polymer composite materials

3/25/2019 2019 - #01 Nuclear materials

Kiryushina V.V. Kovaleva Yu.Yu. Stepanov P.A. Kovalenko P.V.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26583/npe.2019.1.09

UDC: 53.04

Polymer composite materials (PCM) are used extensively and are viewed as candidates for application in various industries, including nuclear power. Despite a variety of methods and procedures to investigate the mechanical characteristics of PCMs, the use of the laboratory sample mechanical test results to design and model large-size structures is not always fully correct and justified. In particular, one of the problems is concerned with taking into account the scale parameter effects on the PCM strength and elastic characteristics immediately in the product.

The purpose of the study is to investigate the scaling factor effects on the mechanical characteristics of fiber glass using phenolformaldehyde and silicon-organic binders and a fabric quartz filler.

Samples of four different standard sizes under GOST 25604-82 and GOST 4648-2014 were tested for three-point bending using an LFM-100 test machine to estimate the scaling factor. The thicknesses of the model samples were chosen with regard for the wall thicknesses of full-scale items under development or in batch production, and the test machine features, and varied in the limits of 1.6 to 7.5 mm.

The tests showed a strength decrease with the sample thickness increase to 3 mm and more both at room and elevated (200 to 500°C) temperatures which can be described by an exponential function based on the Weibull statistical model. The values of the Weibull modulus that characterizes the extent of the scale effects on the strength of the tested materials were 4.6 to 6.7. The average bending strength in the sample thickness range of 3 mm and less does not vary notably or tends to increase slightly as the thickness is increased. This fact makes it possible to conclude that estimation of allowable stresses in a thin-wall item requires the use of test results for samples with a thickness that is equal to the item wall thickness since standard samples may yield overestimated allowable stress values and lead, accordingly, to incorrect calculations of the strength factor.

The results obtained shall be taken into account when defining the permissible levels of operation for full-scale items and structures of polymer composites based on the laboratory sample strength data as well as when estimating their robustness as a characteristic of the item’s safe operation.

References

  1. Vasilyev V.V. Mechaniсs of designs from composite materials. Moscow. Mashinostroenie Publ., 1988, 272 p. (in Russian).
  2. Tarnopolsky Yu.M., Skudra A.M. Constructional durability and deformation of glass2 reinforced plastics. Riga. Zinatne Publ., 1966. 260 p. (in Russian).
  3. Bolotin V.V., Novichkov Yu.N. Mechanics of laminated constructions. Mashinostroenie Publ., 1980. – 375 p. (in Russian).
  4. Bolotin V.V. Statistical methods in structural mechanics. Moscow. Stroyizdat Publ., 1965. – 279 p. (in Russian).
  5. Barinov S.M., Shevchenko V.Ya. Strength of technical ceramics. Moscow. Nauka Publ., 1996, 159 p. (in Russian).
  6. Levshanov V.S., Fetisov V.S., Kiryushina V.V., Verevka V.G., Rusin M.Yu. Size effect on strength of glass-ceramic antenna fairing. Mekhanika kompozitsionnykh materialov i konstruktsij, 2006,v. 12, no. 3, pp. 312-316 (in Russian).
  7. Serensen S.V., Strelyaev V.S. Size effect in tensile test of glass-reinforced plastics. Zavodskaya laboratoriya, 1962, v. XXVIII, no. 4, pp. 483-485 (in Russian).
  8. Serensen S.V., Zaytsev G.P. Destruction of glass-reinforced plastics at short-term loading. Mekhanika polimerov, 1965, no. 2, pp. 93-103 (in Russian).
  9. Ermolenko A.F. Scaling effect of tensile strength of the unidirectional reinforcing elements. Mekhanika kompositnykh materialov, 1986, no. 1, pp. 38-43 (in Russian).
  10. Argon A. Statistical aspects of destruction. Composite materials: In 8 vols. Vol. 5. Moscow. Mir Publ., 1978, pp. 166-205 (in Russian).
  11. Bullock R.E. Strength ratios of composite materials in flexure and tension Journal of Composite Materials, 1974, no. 8, pp. 200-206.
  12. Hitchon J.W., Phillips D.C. The effect of specimen size on the strength of CFRP. Composites, 1978, no. 9, pp. 119-124.
  13. Fudzii T., Dzako M. Fracture mechanics of composite materials. Мoscow. Mir Publ., 1982, 232 p. (in Russian).
  14. Cui W., Wisnom M., Jones M. Effect of specimen size on interlaminar shear strength of unidirectional carbon fiber-epoxy. Composites Engineering, 1994, v. 4, no. 3, pp. 299-307.
  15. Bazant Z.P., Daniel I.M., Li Zhengzhi. Size effect and fracture characteristics of composite laminates. ASME J. Eng. Mat. Tech., 1996, no. 118 (3), pp. 317-324.
  16. Rusin M.Yu. , Vasilenko V.V., Stepanov P.A. Composite materials for a radiotransparent fairing of aircraft. Novye ogneupory, 2014, no. 10, pp. 8-13 (in Russian).
  17. Gurtovnik I.G., Sokolov V.I., Trofimov N.N., Shalgunov S.I. Radiotransparent elements from glass2reinforced plastics. Ed. by V.I. Sokolov. Moscow. Mir Publ., 2003, 368 p. (in Russian).
  18. Kiryushina V.V., Levshanov V.S., Fetisov V.S., Rusin M.Yu. Assessment of Weibull parameters in strength analysis of ceramic materials for antenna fairing. Mekhanika kompositnykh materialov i konstruktsij, 2006, v. 12, no. 1, pp. 76-82 (in Russian).
  19. Kapur K., Lamberson L. Reliability in engineering design. Moscow. Mir Publ., 1980, 607 p. (in Russian).
  20. Ivchenko G.I., Medvedev Yu.I. Mathematical statistics: schoolbook for technical colleges. Moscow. Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1992, 304 p. (in Russian).
  21. Jajatilaka A., Trustrum K. Statistical approach to brittle fracture. Journal Materials Sciences, 1977, v. 12, no 8, pp. 1426-1432.

polymer composite materials fiber glass scaling factor strength Weibull statistical model dimensional effect